-->
Save your FREE seat for Streaming Media Connect in February. Register Now!

How YouTube and Paramount Maximize QoS and QoE in Live Streaming Workflows

Although quality of service (QoS) and quality of experience (QoE) are critical to successful VOD (Video on Demand) and live streaming delivery, the metrics used and the workflow challenges are different for live. YouTube’s Sean McCarthy and Paramount’s Nishant Sirohi enumerate the differences and the key strategies for succeeding with live when the stakes are high in this conversation with PADEM Media Group's Allan McLennan at Streaming Media Connect.

The differences in monitoring and managing QoS and QoE in real-time for live workflows

McLennan asks McCarthy to discuss the differences in monitoring and managing QoS and QoE in real-time for live workflows at YouTube.

“I think at the end of the day, the QoE metrics that we measure from an end user perspective are more or less the same, but in a live workflow, there are more QoS elements and more potential breaking points, and therefore, I think it's personally more important to measure that in real-time,” McCarthy says. “At YouTube, which obviously is a majority VOD platform, I am focused on signal acquisition and live OTT. So, that is always the angle that I'll take when talking about QoS. What types of metrics matter to us? How do we think about the end-to-end signal chain? It's always in the context of a live workflow.”

He emphasizes the differences in perceptual quality metrics in VOD versus live workflows. “I feel [with] VOD workflows, we [don’t] necessarily over the index, but relative to live index [we rely on] more heavily on perceptual quality metrics. A, because it's easier to compute, and B, I would argue that with the creative intent in a Hollywood movie [compared to] a sports production, you want to maintain the integrity of the pixels and how they're displayed on your screens and devices. And I think right now there's a trend in the industry to bring that same rigor of the actual bit flow and pixel quality monitoring to the live workflows.”

The need for real-time monitoring and backup plans to ensure seamless live streaming

McLennan asks Sirohi, “At Paramount, when you're working on this, you're dealing with CBS News and live sports. Now, are you looking at this a little differently, but is this kind of a consistent solution you're trying to fill?”

“How we approach monitoring a live system is a lot different than what we approach on a VOD system," Sirohi says. "There is a lot of leverage we have when we look at our VOD content that we can use to enhance our quality or experience. Pre-warming is one, and being able to test it out is another one. When we come to live streaming, any content, be it sports or a news channel…you are acting in real-time. Your manifest window is rolling out quickly. You must monitor all the points within the new pipeline [to ensure] they are performing as they should be. And if they are not performing, what are your backup plans?

Switching between QoS and QoE metrics to improve future events based on past performance

McLennan asks Sirohi what prompts a switchover to a focus on QoS to QoE.

“My focus, being from the engineering point of view, would always be at the QoS,” Sirohi says. “I will be looking at the QoS metrics in real-time. When we're doing QoE, it is more of a reflection [on] when an event is done, how we can learn from it and improve the next one to make it better. But when we are doing anything in real-time, it will be QoS, looking at the metrics or your monitoring point coming from a different integration point of the system via your encoder packager or your monetizing system, and that all of them are performing as they're supposed to be. And if there are red flags, how do you switch over to the backup path? So those are tradeoffs you have to make in real-time. It depends on the scale of the event, the quality that you want to deliver for it, [and] how many resources you have to do it.”

Join us in February 2025 for more thought leadership, actionable insights, and lively debate at Streaming Media Connect.

Streaming Covers
Free
for qualified subscribers
Subscribe Now Current Issue Past Issues
Related Articles

What’s Next for Interactive Live Streaming in 2025

"Everyone's trying to figure out new revenue streams and where that goes," says Play Anywhere CSO Pete Scott, who expects to see more niche sports leagues and betting, and creator economy content driving growth for targeted audiences in 2025, while Fox TV Stations' Stephen Brown sees sweepstakes betting, second-screen experiences among other areas primed for explosive growth as they reveal all this and more in conversation with Ring Digital's Brian Ring at Streaming Media Connect 2024.

QoE vs. QoS in Live and On-Demand Streaming

How do you define Quality of Experience (QoE) and Quality of Service (QoS) in live and on-demand streaming, and what are the key metrics for measuring them? IMAX's Abdul Rehman, YouTube's Sean McCarthy, SVTA's Jason Thibeault, and PADEM Media Group's Allan McLennan discuss these topics in this clip from Streaming Media Connect 2024.

eCDNs and Optimizing Hybrid Event QoS and QoE

How can enterprise streamers produce and deliver high-engagement and high-reliability hybrid events that serve their streaming audiences as effectively as their on-site participants? The answer is both art and science, strategy, and tech, as LinkedIn's Dan Swiney and MediaPlatform's Mike Newman discuss in this clip from Streaming Media Connect 2023.

How Conviva Quantifies OTT QoE

Conviva's Melissa Yurash explains how Conviva draws quantitative conclusions from qualitative data about streaming and OTT quality of user experience in this clip from Streaming Media West 2022.